Books Read: Crooked House

The list of Agatha Christie books I have not read is dwindling. Christie said that this was one of her favorites to write.

Crooked House, by Agatha Christie

Title & Author

Crooked House, by Agatha Christie (1949)

Summary & Thoughts

After meeting Sophia Leonides abroad and falling in love, Charles Hayward (the narrator) visits her back home in England to properly ask her to marry him. She says she can’t marry him because her grandfather has been murdered (she fears it might be one of the family), and until that is cleared up, she cannot start a new life with anyone. As his father conveniently works with the police (or Scotland Yard? I’m already forgetting which investigative branch he works for), Charles joins the investigation to discover the murderer and clear the air.

And so begin the twists and turns of interviewing the family and staff and looking for clues. Agatha Christie doesn’t disappoint with her usual style of red herrings and confused investigators, and she continues her theme of drawing upon nursery rhymes for titles.

If you haven’t read much Christie, some of my favorites are “Murder on the Orient Express,” “And Then There Were None,” “Cards on the Table,” and “The Murder of Roger Ackroyd.” Though maybe you shouldn’t start with those, as they are some of her best, and you may be disappointed if you read all the best first. Maybe sprinkle them throughout your reading.

Rating

★ ★ ★

Books Read: A Wizard of Earthsea

I started reading this book on the car ride back from the beach. It was hard to stop so I could take my turn driving the last bit of the trip home.

A Wizard of Earthsea, by Ursula K. Le Guin

Title & Author

A Wizard of Earthsea, by Ursula K. Le Guin (1968)

Summary & Thoughts

We meet our hero as a lowly goatherd on a small island, where he is not very prepossessing, but we discover he has magic powers. This is a coming-of-age tale, and an introduction to a fascinating world created by a great imagination. Duny Ged/Sparrowhawk leaves his goats and his family, receives training in wizardry, and sets off on a mission to undo an evil he himself created.

Guys, why has no one told me to read this book before now?? I’ve heard of Ursula K. Le Guin before, but I think I thought this book would be more… science-fictiony? I have no idea why. The book has “wizard” in the title, which should have made me think fantasy, but for whatever reason, I had no idea what to expect.

…And I loved it. I love the world Le Guin created so intricately, and I love the characters and the ways she points to them having other adventures besides just the one she is telling. The book read a little like a myth, but maybe it’s just been a while since I’ve read any fantasy and have forgotten some of it works.

I like a good coming-of-age tale, and a book in which the character comes to know himself better and gains wisdom through experience. I also love world-building, and this book has that in spades. It’s billed as a Young Adult book, and I found it in the “juvenile” section of my public library, but don’t let the shelf names deter you if you’re looking for a good fantasy summer read. I’ve already read the second book in the Earthsea series, The Tombs of Atuan, and have started the third book, The Farthest Shore.

Also, I get the feeling that a lot of people instrumental in creating D&D (dungeons & dragons) really liked this book too…. Could you play Ged’s Earthsea adventures as a campaign? I think yes.

Rating

★ ★ ★ ★

Books Read: North and South

This alas, is only the second in my TBR books challenge. But I’ve now read two of the longer books on my list, so that’s good, I guess? I just got more books from the library today, so I’m making more progress!

North & South, by Elizabeth Gaskell

Title & Author:

North & South, by Elizabeth Gaskell (1854-1855).

Summary & Thoughts:

The story primarily follows Margaret Hale, daughter of an ex-vicar who has left his profession, as she adjusts to life in a strange place in Milton, a cotton-mill town.

The family (a father, mother, and grown daughter) has difficulty learning the culture of the place in which they find themselves. As the title suggests (once you realize it’s a 19th century British novel, not an American Civil War novel), a large part of the book is the clash of the Southern sensibilities and slower pace the Hales bring with them when they relocate to Milton in the North; a bustling factory town with a harsher feel yet productive people.

North & South also includes a brooding, Darcy-esque mill owner, Mr. Thornton, who becomes a pupil of Mr. Hale’s, and an admirer of Margaret’s. The narration usually follows Margaret, but occasionally we get Mr. Thornton’s inner thoughts as well, usually when those thoughts are about Margaret.

While the romance is fairly central, there is also a great deal of discussion about factory economics, and the responsibilities of mill owners, who have a great deal of authority. It was more interesting than I anticipated reading the various opinions on the business side of the book. As well as talking to Mr. Thornton about his views on the responsibilities of mill owners, Margaret befriends Nicholas Higgins, a factory worker, and hears his side of the question as a member of the workers’ Union. There are many discussions of how to protect both the interests of the workers and how the owners/managers ought to act as authority figures who ought not abuse their position of power.

The book has a little of a Pride & Prejudice feel, with the brooding rich man and the outspoken, strong-willed heroine without a fortune.

Apparently Gaskell discusses industrialism and economics and politics more in some of her other works, but I thought this book struck a good balance. I’m not sure that I would have read a book on industrial Britain’s economics alone.

Gaskell doesn’t quite have Austen’s style, but the writing was engaging, and some passages are really beautifully well-written. If you like Jane Austen and want something in a similar vein, give Elizabeth Gaskell a try.

There’s also a BBC adaptation which is fairly faithful to the book. Of course, there are a few exceptions, like the last scene taking place in a train station instead of a drawing room. Because, drama? But overall I thought they did a good job of capturing the feel of the book and the main events.

It’s also a change to see Richard Armitage (aka Thorin from The Hobbit) at normal human height (he’s actually rather tall) and Brendon Coyle (aka Mr. Bates from Downton Abbey and Lark Rise to Candleford) play the same part (magical disappearing limp not included).

Tl;dr:

I liked North & South, and if you like Jane Austen, give Elizabeth Gaskell a try. Fewer balls; more discussions of industrial economics.

Also the BBC miniseries is worth a watch. You’ll probably see actors you know because there are only 30 actors in the UK.

Rating:

★ ★ ★ ★

Books Read: Special Topics in Calamity Physics

For my “TBR Pile Challenge,” I’ve read one book so far. I know, only one — sad. However, in my defense, it was 528 pages. And I’m also 72% of the way through “The Brothers Karamazov”! So I feel ok about that.

Title & Author: Special Topics in Calamity Physics, by Marisha Pessl (2006)

Summary and Thoughts: Blue van Meer, a teenager, is the daughter of an itinerant professor.

She opens by telling the reader that she’s going to talk about the death of Hannah Schneider, and then goes back in time to talk about growing up, moving to a small town, settling into a new school, and the events leading up to and following Hannah’s mysterious and unexpected death.

This book is sort of a mystery-memoir style, while also being incredibly literary. It was given to me by a friend who thought I would appreciate all the references, and I did. Pessl also uses unexpected similes and metaphors, and while they don’t work all the time, and some of the references go over my head, enough of it is accessible to still get the point and move on.

The point isn’t to look up all the references — you can still understand the story without them — but the references to add to the story. Each chapter title, for example, is the title of a book (usually classic literature). If you know the book’s general theme, you will have a clue to what’s going on in the chapter. If you don’t, you’ll find out what happens in the chapter anyway, so don’t let the over-literary-ness deter you.

While the book and narrator may be too literary and clever for its/her own good, it was still a fun read. The narrative threads become more complicated as you get near the end, but that’s all part of the fun.

Also, even though I don’t think I know any teenagers as crazy-smart as Blue, it still made me glad to be an adult and not a teenager. I’m so glad to be finished with that part of my life — being an adult is, in many ways, preferable to being a teenager.

Rating: ★ ★ ★

Book Reviews/Recaps!

Book pages

Since I’m going for the 2015 TBR Pile Challenge this year, and also because I think it will help me remember books I’ve read in general (and I have friends who do similar things), I want to start posting about books I’ve read. I don’t know if I’ll put every book I read here, but I at least want to document my thoughts on them, and invite conversation about books.

Tell me why you disliked a book I liked, or why I should give a book I didn’t like a second chance.

Also, tell me if you prefer Austen or Bronte. I hear usually people fall into one of those categories. Personally, I love both. It’s weird, actually. I have read numerous blog posts/ articles by someone who loved Jane Austen and couldn’t get into Jane Eyre, or people who pledge undying devotion to Jane Eyre and think Pride and Prejudice is just meh. It seems many people prefer one or the other.

I understand that they have very different tones, but I love them both. I would happily pick up Pride & Prejudice or Jane Eyre any day and read them again. Just tell me you want to do a re-read of either and I will leap at the excuse.

…But I digress. Someday I’ll try to analyze why people fall so hard along these lines (and why I don’t want to pick sides). Without further ado, the real point of this post!

Here’s the tentative format (all subject to change at the whim of management):

  • Title & Author (and year of publication)
  • Brief Summary (hopefully spoiler-free or spoiler-light. I’ll warn you if I want to say something spoiler-y)
  • Other thoughts I had on the book
  • Goodreads/Netflix style, I’m also going to try incorporating a star rating for how much I liked the book (I might change my mind tomorrow and think a star rating is a terrible idea. I’m going with it for now).

Maybe I’ll do that with some movies too. Who knows.

Photo by Send me adrift. used under Flickr Creative Commons License.