Books Read: North and South

This alas, is only the second in my TBR books challenge. But I’ve now read two of the longer books on my list, so that’s good, I guess? I just got more books from the library today, so I’m making more progress!

North & South, by Elizabeth Gaskell

Title & Author:

North & South, by Elizabeth Gaskell (1854-1855).

Summary & Thoughts:

The story primarily follows Margaret Hale, daughter of an ex-vicar who has left his profession, as she adjusts to life in a strange place in Milton, a cotton-mill town.

The family (a father, mother, and grown daughter) has difficulty learning the culture of the place in which they find themselves. As the title suggests (once you realize it’s a 19th century British novel, not an American Civil War novel), a large part of the book is the clash of the Southern sensibilities and slower pace the Hales bring with them when they relocate to Milton in the North; a bustling factory town with a harsher feel yet productive people.

North & South also includes a brooding, Darcy-esque mill owner, Mr. Thornton, who becomes a pupil of Mr. Hale’s, and an admirer of Margaret’s. The narration usually follows Margaret, but occasionally we get Mr. Thornton’s inner thoughts as well, usually when those thoughts are about Margaret.

While the romance is fairly central, there is also a great deal of discussion about factory economics, and the responsibilities of mill owners, who have a great deal of authority. It was more interesting than I anticipated reading the various opinions on the business side of the book. As well as talking to Mr. Thornton about his views on the responsibilities of mill owners, Margaret befriends Nicholas Higgins, a factory worker, and hears his side of the question as a member of the workers’ Union. There are many discussions of how to protect both the interests of the workers and how the owners/managers ought to act as authority figures who ought not abuse their position of power.

The book has a little of a Pride & Prejudice feel, with the brooding rich man and the outspoken, strong-willed heroine without a fortune.

Apparently Gaskell discusses industrialism and economics and politics more in some of her other works, but I thought this book struck a good balance. I’m not sure that I would have read a book on industrial Britain’s economics alone.

Gaskell doesn’t quite have Austen’s style, but the writing was engaging, and some passages are really beautifully well-written. If you like Jane Austen and want something in a similar vein, give Elizabeth Gaskell a try.

There’s also a BBC adaptation which is fairly faithful to the book. Of course, there are a few exceptions, like the last scene taking place in a train station instead of a drawing room. Because, drama? But overall I thought they did a good job of capturing the feel of the book and the main events.

It’s also a change to see Richard Armitage (aka Thorin from The Hobbit) at normal human height (he’s actually rather tall) and Brendon Coyle (aka Mr. Bates from Downton Abbey and Lark Rise to Candleford) play the same part (magical disappearing limp not included).

Tl;dr:

I liked North & South, and if you like Jane Austen, give Elizabeth Gaskell a try. Fewer balls; more discussions of industrial economics.

Also the BBC miniseries is worth a watch. You’ll probably see actors you know because there are only 30 actors in the UK.

Rating:

★ ★ ★ ★

Books Read: Special Topics in Calamity Physics

For my “TBR Pile Challenge,” I’ve read one book so far. I know, only one — sad. However, in my defense, it was 528 pages. And I’m also 72% of the way through “The Brothers Karamazov”! So I feel ok about that.

Title & Author: Special Topics in Calamity Physics, by Marisha Pessl (2006)

Summary and Thoughts: Blue van Meer, a teenager, is the daughter of an itinerant professor.

She opens by telling the reader that she’s going to talk about the death of Hannah Schneider, and then goes back in time to talk about growing up, moving to a small town, settling into a new school, and the events leading up to and following Hannah’s mysterious and unexpected death.

This book is sort of a mystery-memoir style, while also being incredibly literary. It was given to me by a friend who thought I would appreciate all the references, and I did. Pessl also uses unexpected similes and metaphors, and while they don’t work all the time, and some of the references go over my head, enough of it is accessible to still get the point and move on.

The point isn’t to look up all the references — you can still understand the story without them — but the references to add to the story. Each chapter title, for example, is the title of a book (usually classic literature). If you know the book’s general theme, you will have a clue to what’s going on in the chapter. If you don’t, you’ll find out what happens in the chapter anyway, so don’t let the over-literary-ness deter you.

While the book and narrator may be too literary and clever for its/her own good, it was still a fun read. The narrative threads become more complicated as you get near the end, but that’s all part of the fun.

Also, even though I don’t think I know any teenagers as crazy-smart as Blue, it still made me glad to be an adult and not a teenager. I’m so glad to be finished with that part of my life — being an adult is, in many ways, preferable to being a teenager.

Rating: ★ ★ ★

Book Reviews/Recaps!

Book pages

Since I’m going for the 2015 TBR Pile Challenge this year, and also because I think it will help me remember books I’ve read in general (and I have friends who do similar things), I want to start posting about books I’ve read. I don’t know if I’ll put every book I read here, but I at least want to document my thoughts on them, and invite conversation about books.

Tell me why you disliked a book I liked, or why I should give a book I didn’t like a second chance.

Also, tell me if you prefer Austen or Bronte. I hear usually people fall into one of those categories. Personally, I love both. It’s weird, actually. I have read numerous blog posts/ articles by someone who loved Jane Austen and couldn’t get into Jane Eyre, or people who pledge undying devotion to Jane Eyre and think Pride and Prejudice is just meh. It seems many people prefer one or the other.

I understand that they have very different tones, but I love them both. I would happily pick up Pride & Prejudice or Jane Eyre any day and read them again. Just tell me you want to do a re-read of either and I will leap at the excuse.

…But I digress. Someday I’ll try to analyze why people fall so hard along these lines (and why I don’t want to pick sides). Without further ado, the real point of this post!

Here’s the tentative format (all subject to change at the whim of management):

  • Title & Author (and year of publication)
  • Brief Summary (hopefully spoiler-free or spoiler-light. I’ll warn you if I want to say something spoiler-y)
  • Other thoughts I had on the book
  • Goodreads/Netflix style, I’m also going to try incorporating a star rating for how much I liked the book (I might change my mind tomorrow and think a star rating is a terrible idea. I’m going with it for now).

Maybe I’ll do that with some movies too. Who knows.

Photo by Send me adrift. used under Flickr Creative Commons License.

“To Be Read” Pile Reading Challange

Last year I started the “Back to the Classics” reading challenge. It seemed like a great idea, but then I got bogged down in “The Brothers Karamazov,” and after that I read some but never really recovered from being over-ambitious in January and then not moving on from that quickly enough to keep going. So I didn’t post any updates. Fail.

Also, in the fall we bought a house, so that kind of ate up my free time. Guys, buying a house is like having a part-time job. My head was too full to do much serious reading.

This year, instead of trying that challenge, I’m going to try one called the “TBR Challenge,” which is basically an attempt to read those books you’ve bought or otherwise had on your list of books to read, but for whatever reason, haven’t gotten around to yet.

I’m picking one per month, so 12 books, but I realize some longer books might take a while. We’ll see how I do.

Here’s a link to the post in case you want to sign up or check out the rules.

man-who-was-thursday

And here are my 12 books (not necessarily in the order I want to read them in):

  1. The Picture of Dorian Gray – Oscar Wilde (1891)
  2. The Man Who Was Thursday – G.K. Chesterton (1908)
  3. North & South – Elizabeth Gaskell (1855)
  4. Special Topics in Calamity Physics – Marisha Pessl (2006)
  5. Awakenings – Oliver Sacks (1973)
  6. Gilead -Marilynne Robinson (2004)
  7. The Secret Adversary -Agatha Christie (1922)
  8. Crooked House – Agatha Christie (1949)
  9. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks – Rebecca Skloot (2010)
  10. The Ocean at the End of the Lane -Neil Gaiman (2013)
  11. A Wizard of Earthsea -Ursula K. Le Guin (1968)
  12. Ender’s Shadow – Orson Scott Card (1999)

And 2 alternates, in case I get in too deep and am not going to make it with one of the others (such a kind rule!):

  1. Nathan Coulter – Wendell Berry (1960)
  2. Bird by Bird – Anne Lamott (1995)

I’ll also try to remember to link back to this post with updates throughout the year. Here’s to hoping I’m steadier in my reading plan in 2015 (apologies in advance if I’m not).

 

Photo by C.J. Kershner used under Flickr Creative Commons license.

Disney and Brave

On a recent plane ride, I was bumped up to the Economy Comfort section, which meant a little extra cushion on the head rest, a little more of the coveted leg room, and free movies or tv.

Knowing that sound on planes leaves something to be desired, I opted for a lighter movie: Disney’s Brave.

Princess Merida - Disney's Brave

I would give it a solid “meh.” There we’re aspects of it I liked, and aspects that either didn’t work and some things that frustrated me.

Things I liked:

  • the movie wasn’t just about a Princess growing up and automatically falling in love. I appreciate that. Girls can do other things.
  • both parents were alive. Unusual for Disney princesses.
  • the central relationship was the mother-daughter relationship. Since the mother is usually not alive for the story, this was a pleasant change.

Things I didn’t like:

  • the pacing was sometimes a little labored. Maybe it’s that I’m not 8, but I got tired of watching them race around the castle after a few minutes.
  • the 3 little brothers. I think they were supposed to be funny, but again, I’m not 8, so it wasn’t as effective for me.

The main I didn’t like:

  • the portrayal of men

And now, the soapbox:

What really bothered me was thinking the reason Princess Merida didn’t want to get married was that all her options were oafish males who were more interested in hitting each other over the head than…pretty much anything else. I think it’s great to see a story about a girl who isn’t just interested in finding true love, but it would have been more interesting to me to hear her saying, “these guys are nice, but I’m just not interested in them.” In this movie, the guys gave her no reason to be interested in them. In fact, you’re relieved she isn’t settling for the stupid one or the vain one or…the third one. I forget why he was objectionable, but clearly, he didn’t have much going for him.

Even Merida’s father, who loves and cares for his daughter, is a little slow and clueless–all the thinking is done by his wife. He is a giant fighter who is easily distracted by weapons and ready to pick a fight at a moment’s notice. His wife does all the planning and I think the only reason he was made king is that every other male is equally interested in fighting, so his prowess made him a good choice. And his wife probably convinced all the other wives that it would be a good idea.

I know the story was trying to tell girls that other interests matter, and that you should listen to your mother occasionally, but what does this tell boys who sit through this movie with their sisters? I know many men who are intelligent, kind, and not easily provoked into hitting each other over the head (well, maybe if they’re age 3 they might be more prone to hitting; but I’m talking about adults here). By all means, tell us about princesses who find other things to do with their time (and the princesses who get married need to do something once they’ve found a prince), but we do not have to tell those stories at the expense of men.